ABSTRACT
Background: Electrolytes play an important role in various physiological functions of the body. Electrolyte disturbances are one of the most common problems encountered in critically ill patients. Drugs are also known to cause adverse electrolyte consequences. These drugs could be anti-hypertensive agents, hormones, antipsychotics or steroids. There is paucity of published literature on electrolyte disturbances caused by drugs. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the electrolyte disturbances caused by various drugs in critically ill patients.Methods: Following approval of the Institutional Ethics Committee, data collection was started. Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) presenting as an electrolyte disturbance in emergency medicine department or occurring in hospitalized patients in the Intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital was be collected. ADRs resulting into electrolyte disturbances were identified and analysed in detail for demographic details, types of electrolyte disturbances, seriousness, severity, causality and preventability of ADRs. Fisher's exact test was done to find out the statistical difference between the electrolyte disturbances and different drugs.Results: Total 58 ADRs were reported as an electrolyte disturbance. Mean age of the patients affected was 52.48 years. Highest number of ADRs were observed in the age group of 61 to 70 years. Hypokalemia constituted 32 cases (55.2%) followed by hyponatremia (25.9%), hyperkalemia (6.9%), hypernatremia (6.9%), hypocalcemia (1.7%), hypomagnesemia (1.7%) and hypophosphatemia (1.7%). Insulin was associated with maximum cases of ADRs (27.6%).Conclusions: Electrolyte disturbances constitutes a major chunk of ADRs especially in critically ill patients. The physicians must be well-versed with the dynamics of fluid-electrolyte balance.
ABSTRACT
Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are negative consequences of drug therapy. ADR results in diminished quality of life, increased physician visits, hospitalizations, and even death. Hence a study was planned to detect and analyze ADR encountered in emergency medicine department.Methods: Data was collected over a period of 1 year after taking approval from IRB (Institutional Review Board) and written informed consent from patients. ADRs presenting as a cause of hospital admission or developed during hospitalization were analyzed.Results: A total of 229 ADRs were analyzed. Majority of ADRs were found in the age group of 40-60 Years. The M: F Ratio was 1.10:1. According to Wills and Brown Classification, majority of the ADRs belonged to Type A. According to Hartwig and Siegel classification of severity of ADRs, 18.78% of the ADRs were severe in nature. According to Schumock and Thornton preventability score, majority (64.19%) of the ADRs were not preventable, whereas 17.03% were definitely preventable. 120 (52.40%) of the ADRs were serious in nature Anti-infective were the most common drug class (30.13%) followed by CVS (24.03%) group of drugs. About (57.64%) ADRs fall in the category of probable/likely. Regarding their Outcome, 44.10% of the ADRs were recovered and 43.23% were recovering.Conclusions: Anti-infective were the most reported drug class to cause ADRs in a tertiary care emergency medicine department. Causality assessment according to WHO-UMC and Naranjo’s causality assessment criteria reported to be Probable. Whereas modified Schumock and Thornton scale preventability scale showed that majority were not preventable.